Isn't Global Warming a natural process?

Samuel Fahnrich/3:36 EST/1-18-08
Isn't Global Warming a natural process?

There is what some call the inevitable doom of earth encircling our world, a giant collection of history gone wrong. Encompassing our schools, and violating our bodies beyond our expectations. Global warming is causing drought and flooding at the same time. Some species are expected to become extinct, while others will only become endangered. The lucky ones will experience long and depriving heat waves that will perpetuate the already overwhelming demands of vital substances in the few fertile regions left. Our climate is changing beyond the limits we can spare. Global warming is here and unless dealt with properly, as with anything, we will all die. So what else is new?

The UN has a set of scenarios that map out what is expected to happen, when these events are planned to occur, and their severity of outcomes depending on reaction time. After years of research and development, scientist can now blame America and China for causing our ultimate end. However, if you want to get specific I hear most people are blaming Bush (No re-elections this time).

Although scientists can't blame the poor and elderly for causing global warming, they are claiming harder times for them. This is due to the often rising change of climate, leading to a weaker immune system, leading to health problems, leading to the threat of life for the elderly and poor.

What are the plans of adjustment you may ask. For now, the UN is calling for a "reduction of emission" policy on all gas production. Meaning, more restrictions on vehicle use and contaminants from factories. Just think what the world would look like if Los Angeles had not gone hay'wired with complex highways, or Detroit had never produced a car. Would global warming still exist?

PS- hay'wired is an acknowledged word in Webster's Dictionary.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=3880571