J. Robert McKnight
2-13-09
9:30
I admit, it's hard to take an oil guy's statements on the inadvisability of speedily investing tons of money in alternative energy... But I did take this from the story, though. By solving this or that problem by investing in alt. energy, it's potentially creating new problems for others. What's our rapid oil boycott going to do to Saudi Arabia? It won't be good, that's for sure, so Mr. Naimi's got to say something. Whether he's worried about America suffering a hiccup or Saudi Arabia being paralyzed is for us to decide.
For me, it's sort of like Americans not buying as many televisions or cars right now. That's what this whole economic downturn is about I guess but I'm still glad a little less crap is getting manufactured. Do we have to make tons and tons of crap to sustain? If we do, is that even sustaining? We can't just keep making more stuff just like we can't keep using "traditional" energy. That's the bottom line, for me. The continued existence of the planet (and by extension, everything that lives on it), then whatever.
2 comments:
If he had posited some type of realistic scenario in which alternative energy would "not work like expected" I could see some relevance to his argument. However, given his position within the oil industry and his main concern in the issue being the potential economic disturbance of moving to alternative energy, it really becomes difficult to take him seriously.
My first instinct says he is protecting his investments, as many will try to do. To some extent however I can see how an abrupt change may shake some old traditional establishments. I think I would call that growing pains. There is a more serious problem, the health of the planet, which must be put ahead of greed and fear.
Post a Comment