Robert McKnight
3-27-09
11:31
Apparently, it's entirely possible for both sides to get what they want. According to the U.S. Energy Department, "enough sunlight hits a 100-square-mile portion of the Nevada desert to power the entire country, if it could be harnessed." It's all a matter of determining what parts of the enormous Southwestern desert region contain habitat areas vital to indigenous species of plants and animals. Those parts that do, should be left alone, those parts that don't, should have gigantic renewable energy facilities. The circle of life...
Quite an interesting confrontation, here. In these times of earth-crippling-urban-sprawl, thousands of square-miles of uninhabited land (particularly in California) is very rare and very precious, but we're also in a time of earth-crippling-carbon-based-self-destruction. We need to transition to renewable energy and we need land to do it on. The greater good seems fairly obvious here (the planet over a portion of the California desert), but it's certainly worth thinking about.
1 comment:
The debate between conservation & technology will probably continune to be a hot topic, and one worth understanding to possibly prevent such extreme senarios.
Post a Comment