Jordan R. Gomillion
September 24th, 2009
SOC 202
The article starts off explaining the need for Sri Lanka to reform their laws to basically give rights to migrant workers. G.D.G.P. Soysa explains to us the five waves of migration that took place due to “migrant friendly” policy, such as during the 17th century when Britain, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands and France established colonies and allowed the population to settle in new territories. Next, the article discusses Middle East migration. It tells us about the growth of migrant labor the Middle East, and the human cost that it takes. Saying that it leads to emotional and psychological strain, relating it to Sri Lanka about how it has also led to labor markets being female dominated. Also, how countries in the Middle East must find a way to manage the migrant work force, being that it is on the rise. Not to mention the struggle with illegal recruiting agencies. Trade unions normally fear the recruitment of migrant workers, but the ILO has noted that unions can help organize migrants and create a positive image for them.
Once again the issue arises over whether or not migrant workers should have rights. It’s an extremely sensitive subject. I kind of don’t know how to feel about the issue in Sri Lanka however. Here in the United States I can argue that we’re supposed to be the land of opportunity, so even though workers come here illegally, they’re coming because of the perception that they can provide a better life for their families. Every country has stratification but it may be to a different extreme in the Middle East, personally I say that it will be a long time before anyone notices that migrants deserve rights. For the simple fact that there is always another willing to work in harsher conditions and lower pay, it is basically an endless supply of workers. In my opinion they deserve labor rights, but that’s an uphill battle that’s not close to being won.
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/090920/FinancialTimes/ft33.html
No comments:
Post a Comment