In this article, the main issue being discussed is the human rights and how those rights should be equally enforced for human beings around the world especially those in Libya and Britain. As we all know, Libya is was under governmental oppression for over forty years and are they seek to enforce the importance of restrictions and human rights of empowerment. Britain however, is well known for their major efforts in promoting leadership on human rights. Much controversy had arose about this issue that it influenced the Labour government to pass the Human Rights Act.
This act's intended purpose was to give everyone as human beings equal rights and were entitled to their own opinions and reasonings. After this law was passed, government officials spent years and years trashing and bashing the law which made citizens feel that the their government system as a whole was conflicted and wasn't considered to be tooken seriously by the government. However, the goverment disputed these myths and accusations and claimed the human rights act was considered to be both essential and beneficial to the UK. In this upcoming November, the UK will take over the chairmanship of the Council of Europe. The goverment sees this as a good opportunity to reform the European courts. Most human rights are considered to be corrupted and manipulative in the court systems.
In my opinion human rights and its laws is not fulfilling all the requirements and standards they set out to do. Therefore many contradictions and myths are being told. I feel like it is up to the government to improve their standards and uphold the stature of human rights. Not only for the current citizens of the UK, but for all the future generations to come.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/25/need-uk-bill-of-rights
This act's intended purpose was to give everyone as human beings equal rights and were entitled to their own opinions and reasonings. After this law was passed, government officials spent years and years trashing and bashing the law which made citizens feel that the their government system as a whole was conflicted and wasn't considered to be tooken seriously by the government. However, the goverment disputed these myths and accusations and claimed the human rights act was considered to be both essential and beneficial to the UK. In this upcoming November, the UK will take over the chairmanship of the Council of Europe. The goverment sees this as a good opportunity to reform the European courts. Most human rights are considered to be corrupted and manipulative in the court systems.
In my opinion human rights and its laws is not fulfilling all the requirements and standards they set out to do. Therefore many contradictions and myths are being told. I feel like it is up to the government to improve their standards and uphold the stature of human rights. Not only for the current citizens of the UK, but for all the future generations to come.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/25/need-uk-bill-of-rights
No comments:
Post a Comment