During a
protest in Paris seven people were surrounded, and brought in by police for
questioning. The reason these people were brought in for questioning was not
the actual protest, but because the balaclava’s they had on were breaking
French law against wearing full-face face veils. The law was passed to combat what the president at the time,
Nicolas Sarkozy, considered a rise in Islamic extremism in France. Before the
law passed there were critics who worried that the law would cause increased
tensions about Muslims, and also accusations of racism. Now, a year and some
months later those for and against the law agree that the impact was far less
dramatic than expected, because of tolerance from most Muslim’s and police.
Simply because the impact is less dramatic than expected does not mean the
impact was not felt. To avoid claims of the law being discriminatory, Sarkozy
government wrote the bill as a “security measure” to prevent anyone from
wearing clothing that hides the face. According to this article, defenders of
the law said that it was necessary to preserve the secularism of the public
space, and that the Muslim population in France needed to accept French norms.
Although there has been cooperation for the majority of the Muslim women in
France, it has in essence confined them a norm that is not their own, and in
some cases causes them to literally confine themselves to their homes. Those in
favor of the law also said that “the law protected Muslim women from religious
extremism and gave them freedom of choice, rather than taking it away.” (NY
Times) I do not understand the logic behind applying the phrase “freedom of
choice” to this law at all. I think it is in direct opposition to basic human
rights, and the arrest of the protestors on the basis of apparel only hits the
beginning of why that is so. A Muslim women living in Paris, named Hind Ahmas,
says “I feel like France has decided to boycott some human rights.” (NY Times)
Ahmas plans on appealing an arrest and fine to the highest court of France, and
hopes to then bring this law in front of the European Court of Human Rights, to
question it’s validity on the basis of religious freedom.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/world/europe/tolerance-eases-impact-of-french-ban-on-full-face-veils.html?pagewanted=1&ref=freedomandhumanrights&adxnnlx=1347044670-vg1dc4I/Pa9MBWfh44qT%20w
No comments:
Post a Comment