Friday, April 05, 2013

Blog # 9 Geo engineering to solve global warming may be very hazardous to the planets future


Geo projects that may be used to cool the planet need to be approved by different world governments to reduce the danger of catastrophic accidents, Met Office researchers have called for global oversight of the schemes after studies have shown that they could have huge and unintended impacts on some of the world's most vulnerable nations .The dangers started in projects that cooled the planet unevenly. In some cases the results caused tremendous droughts across Africa; in others they increased rainfall in the region but left huge areas of Brazil dry and prone to drought. Geo engineering comes in many methods, but the most plausible is "solar radiation management" (SRM) schemes that would disperse huge amounts of sun-reflecting particles high into the atmosphere to simulate the cooling effects of volcanic eruptions. Volcanoes have been known to blast millions of tons of sulfate particles into the stratosphere, where they stay afloat for years and eventually cool the planet by reflecting some of the sun's energy back out to the stratosphere. In 2009, a Royal Society report warned that geo engineering was not an alternative to cutting greenhouse gas emissions, but conceded the technology might be needed and could prove effective in the event of a climate emergency. Jim Haywood, Met Office's Hadley Centre in Exeter employee said that moves to cool the climate by spraying sulfate particles into the atmosphere could go spectacularly wrong. Research has shown from previous eruptions that it might help in one place but do more harm in another including drought and the killing of vegetation.  

The issue to solve global warming reminds of the current debate of healthcare reform within our nation as we discussed in class. There are a lot of stakeholders and a great amount of how our nation will be structured will be based on the new steps. This is similar in that the proposal to rectify global warming many people will not happy with the results but we can’t as a world solve the problems in one place to let them arise in another. We need to embrace policy makers who can make this issue more prevalent to people in their everyday living. Countries need to continue to work together to solve the smaller problems preemptively so that we may avoid the larger ones later.
 
 
Christopher Roberts
5 April 2013
1:06pm

No comments: