The United States and the rest of the world is beginning to
emerge into a divide on whether or not to publish, or keep secret, the results
and details of a newly engineered mutant bird flu virus, a virus that can pass
through the air between animals. This split is hopefully planning to be
resolved when new data (saying the disease is not as lethal as believed), is
put up to the test in the upcoming US-based advisory panel for these tests.
In
the later part of 2011, a panel of US scientists and biosecurity experts
studied “two US-funded studies that showed how an engineered bird fly, H5N1
virus, could be transmitted in the air between ferrets in a lab”. The results
and data was reviewed by the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity
(NSABB) and they found the data to be too risky, and if issued to the general
public it could ‘spark a deadly pandemic’, if the flu escaped or were unleashed
by spiteful members who knew of the virus.
Here’s
where the rest of the world comes in, a meeting of international flu experts
earlier this month came to a conclusion quite different. They found that the
data should eventually be published in its entirety. Argument and discourse has
gone back and forth between the US and the international group based in Geneva
for the past month. The virus does not pose any serious or death related
threat. Michael Osterholm, the director of the Center for Infectious Disease in
the US, simply requests the information stays on hold till they “know much more
about this”.
I
stand of the US’s side in this case, I believe that if information pertaining
to a disease, and potentially a serious one, should stay completely under wraps
until all knowledge about it is known. Alerting the public could cause for
serious concern by some, which could lead to a deadly pandemic, as the NSABB
concluded. The bad thing now, is some information has been released…as in this
article… and people around the world are going to see 1) Potential for a deadly
virus is on the rise and 2) Health officials from all over the world are
arguing about whether or not to release secret details about the virus.
The
job for citizens, and the right to them, is to be well informed, and they are
being informed in a “shady” manner. Keeping information from people and only
releasing snips from an argument between international health leaders is only
going to make people worry even more than just releasing the information.
No comments:
Post a Comment