Last October, a 14-year-old girl named Malala Yousafzai was
brutally shot in the head by a Taliban gunman in her country of Pakistan. She
was shot because of her avid beliefs and outspokenness that women should have
the same educational rights worldwide. After an edict that banned girls from
attending school, she gained the media’s attention via blogging and was
featured in a New York Times documentary. Behaviors of this proportion are worthy
of reprimand via harsh punishment (sometimes fatal) in many places around the
world. Fortunately, Yousafzai survived the attack to be the youngest person
nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize and still advocate for women and girls’
education around the world. After the shooting, a
$10 million fund was created in Yousafzai’s name by Pakistan’s president
as well as other funds granted by other prestigious individuals. The article
included startling facts about females and education globally.
According to the United Nations Population Fund, about 63
percent of the 163 million illiterate youth in the world are female. UNICEF
reports there are 115 million 6- to 12-year-olds not in school, about 60
percent of who are female. Gender equality is a universal human right and needs
be protected across the globe.
The story of Yousafzai is a classic example of an
extreme patriarchal society with a strict, militant regime whose sole purpose
is to enforce traditional laws at all cost. Likewise, the text talks about this
in The Continued Perils of Being Female
which states, “Throughout the world, women continue to be victims of violence, sexual
exploitation and discrimination. (Sernau, 89)” I found it every interesting
also in the text, “Japan, which has less class inequality than much of the industrialized
world, has greater gender inequality. (Sernau, 90)” Although it’s politically
correct to state “there is no hierarchy of oppression” this notion is contextually
subjective.
Numerous
studies have demonstrated how valuable of an asset women are to society when
they are granted equal rights. Empowering women increases development and
reduces poverty. When women have more autonomy concerning the family income,
they are more likely to spend it on their children’s education, health care,
food and other expenses that can benefit the entire family.
The above exert from the article
would dispel the sociological term “feminization of poverty” because women
would become valuable assets to society as educated, autonomous, productive
members. Lastly, the article mentioned, “Everyone deserves the opportunity to
pursue an education, no matter the gender, background or economic class,” which
ties into a basic principle of sociology—education should be stratified
throughout society.
Rayna Tyson. February 19, 2013. 10:43PM
1 comment:
Hello guys!
I have really enjoyed reading through your blog! I think you have some real quality stuff there and you certainly take up tough subjects. I like it!
I am looking for passionate writers to join our community of bloggers and I was wondering whether you would consider sharing your posts on Glipho and become a member?
It might be a good idea to give your writing and your blog more exposure while having fun and meeting fellow writers.
Please check us out at glipho.com and give me a shout at hubert@glipho.com for any questions.
Best!
Hubert
Post a Comment