Carla Neal/Feb. 10 2008/10:15 am/Democracy Post
An interview was featured in a recent magazine issue with a man named Kasparov who ran against the current president of
The first problem with the article is that Kasparov does not give us any evidence to support his statements. He accuses Putin of “messing” with human rights but doesn’t give examples. This is a problem because most other sources are saying that Putin is respectable and good for his country, so for Kasparov to have any credibility he needs to provide evidence supporting his claims, also, Kasparov’s claims of election tampering are invalid because most losing opponents say or at least think that to some degree leaving us to wonder if that’s not what is going on here. So while George W. definitely isn’t the most credible person in the world even when it comes to democracy, this guy provides us with no evidence to support his claims, which makes it look like he’s just upset about losing.
2 comments:
You know these are similar claims which kicked off all the recent troubles with Kenya... well of course its a different setting but I just find that to be interesting in and of it self.
I'm really glad that you poited out why this guy is so off and he is not a good source. Most people will believe anything they read and it really important that people look at the source of their information and who says things. Also I think people have trouble figuring out between fact and Opinion
--Esther Mandelstamm
Post a Comment