For this week, I decided
to examine the international reaction to the fatal shooting involving three
Muslims that occurred on Tuesday in Chapel Hill. The New York Times covered the
international reaction while focusing in particular on the way in which Jordanians
perceived the media coverage of the event. As noted by the New York Times, the
shooting occurred on Tuesday but was largely ignored by mass media until the
next day which has led many
commentators to suggest that Western media is hesitant to cover hate crimes
against Muslims in the news. Furthermore, the shooting has largely been
attributed to a parking dispute in the media despite the fact that most
involved parties believe that the crime was an act of hate against
Muslims.
The
way in which the case has been handled thus far has led many Jordanian comics
and international commentators to weigh in on the ways in which the religious
aspects of this particular incident have been largely ignored. Dr. Abu-Salha actually
argues in the Times article that crimes committed by Muslims are usually
covered constantly while crimes against Muslims are generally ignored by the
media when possible.
In
fact, the international reaction has been so strong that some Jordanian social
activists are calling for a march in Amman to mourn the death of the victims.
Regardless of whether or not this particular crime was fueled by hatred or not,
it serves as a perfect example of how conflict in the Middle East is impacting
local events in regards to how those events are viewed and the significance of
those events in regards to the larger picture.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/14/world/middleeast/online-commenters-see-reporting-bias-in-killing-of-3-muslims.html?ref=world
Ashley Rydzfski
2/13/15 10:43pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/14/world/middleeast/online-commenters-see-reporting-bias-in-killing-of-3-muslims.html?ref=world
Ashley Rydzfski
2/13/15 10:43pm
No comments:
Post a Comment