“Computer hackers have become a fact of life in recent
years,” says Marcus Mabry from the New York Times. Mabry has been covering this
story for the past couple weeks when the Chinese were accused of hacking into
The New York Times. This may have all began with the New York Times, but as we
know from other articles they were not the only victims. When Mabry speaks with
Nicole Perlroth, a New York Times reporter, she speaks on behalf of why other
companies are just now reporting to the public that they too have been hacked
and most importantly what do these companies have to gain in going public with
this matter.
In the last few weeks Twitter, Facebook, even apple have
spoken publically about being victims of Chinese hackers. What does Twitter,
Facebook, etc. hope to achieve at this point? Perlroth admits that there are a
few dynamic to the now immediately response from companies. We know that soon
after The New York Times said they were hacked The Wall Street Journal rapidly
followed. The same patterned was seen with Twitter when they claimed 250,000 of
its user accounts had been ‘potential’ accessed and that they knew of other
companies being hit as well. Then Facebook and Apple came forward and it
becomes a question of whether these companies came forward to possibly gain
something in the end. My first opinion of this was that these ‘other’ secondary
companies heard of the hacks and went through their systems to verify whether
or not they too had been hacked.
However, Perlroth is suspicious of this pattern saying, “…other
companies are jumping into the fray because it’s better for them to announce in
a crowd than it would be for them to announce sort of in some silence later on.”
So is the only reason they are coming out about the issue is to save their
butts later?
Mabry questions whether companies are trying to bury the
news of the fact that there was an ‘avalanche’ of headlines from their
competitors. Google was actual the first t come out in 2010 when they had
suspicions of the Chinese hacking into their Google accounts, but also said
they were not the only ones. In fact there were about 30 other companies who were
attacked by the same group; HOWEVER, out of those 30 companies only 2 came
forward to address the issue!
It’s nice to finally see companies stepping forward but is
it too late? Perlroth claims that the reason for so much hesitation is because
companies fear coming out may affect their stock prices, lawsuits, and whether
they will look like amateurs or not. Even suspicion is drawn on whether this is
the companies fault or their layers holding them back. Hopefully we will find
out more next week.
http://www.nytimes.com/video/2013/02/21/business/100000002077643/going-public-with-cyberattacks.html
Melanie Maldonado
3/1/2013
4:58 pm
No comments:
Post a Comment