Japan, among the
world’s top polluters, has new goals to address the threats of a changing
climate by reducing its current greenhouse gas emissions. However, it has taken
major steps backwards from its pledges to reduce its pollution. An estimated 3
percent more greenhouse gases will be released by 2020 than its emissions in
1990. The country relies on nuclear power to provide about 30 percent of its
electricity. Due to the 2011 disaster at Fukushima, the governing body shut
down nuclear power plants to ease its citizen’s worry over safety. However, the
government is now seeking economic growth and has plans to restart the
reactors, despite the failure to stay within its emission targets. The leader of
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change stated that Japan has
made strides in efficiency and renewable power, hopefully making the new
targets achievable. Backtracking on emission levels like Japan and Australia
are doing could essentially reduce the global efforts previously made by other
countries that agreed to reduce its industrial emissions.
Global efforts
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions cannot work with only a few of the leading
countries that produce nearly 70 percent of emissions (United States, China,
Japan, India and Russia) reducing its industrial emissions. It takes a
consolidated effort to reduce the global levels of greenhouse gases. This
brings up the topic of should there be a global governing body to hold each
nation accountable? What does that mean for sovereignty? Also, the idea of
developed vs. developing nations and their limitations on emissions. How can
the developed nations determine the right and wrong type of industrialization when
they are the ones most responsible for the current pollution levels?
Breanna Steinke
4:00PM
11/15/2013
11/15/2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/16/world/asia/japan-shelves-plan-to-slash-emissions-citing-fukushima.html?ref=international-home&_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment