Pakistan has suffered many acts of terrorism over the
past few years, last year over two thousand people were killed in such attacks.
In the wake of worldwide efforts to thwart terrorism after the 2001 September
11th attacks, Pakistan remained silent. Now, however, it has begun efforts to
draft its own legal efforts to combat potential terrorist threats. The new law,
which models many of its passages after the US Patriot Act, is set to expand
the power of judges and the military. International Human Rights groups are
worried that these new powers are too vague to avoid abuses. One such provision
allows anyone "reasonably able to be inferred as an enemy combatant"
or "enemy alien" to be detained by the government indefinitely.
Criticisms have been launched at the bill that it might be unfairly used to
persecute Afghani refugees, displaced from their own country in part by the
political turmoil following the US ground invasion and war on terror. There are
already reports of internment camps and citizens disappearing. The new law even
allows the military to seize potential terrorists without a warrant. There is also
the question of "Why now?" Over a decade after many other countries
passed sweeping bills similar to the Patriot Act, what does Pakistan hope to
gain by implementing these new policies now?
The US Patriot Act was passed without too much
effort after the devastating terrorist attacks of September 11th. People wanted
to feel protected and safe, and the Patriot Act offered them that safety.
However, hidden under the innocuous and nationalist title, the Patriot Act had
many vaguely defined clauses and extensions of powers, many that activists
thought were ripe for abuse. After the recent NSA whistle blowing case domestic
surveillance and government spying has hit the headlines and everyone has
something to say about it. However, many of the issues the world faces now are
in part due to clauses and amendments within the Patriot Act itself. Wiretapping
and detainment of US citizens under suspicion of terrorist activities or ties to
terrorist cells could, and potentially have already been used, to persecute or
put pressure on dissidents and political activists. The vague nature of these
documents, and the vague way in which they describe not only terrorism, but
enemy combatants, causes much concern for international human rights groups.
Pakistan itself has already seen allegations of abuse of power and detainment.
Activists have gone missing, even random average citizens have reported being
detained by police without warrants, or even being informed of why or where
they were being held. It is possible for these documents, through their
intentional ambiguous nature, to allow new powers to suppress political rivals
or activism. As pressure continues to build against the US's domestic policy on
surveillance, the Patriot Act, and the actions of the NSA, it is odd that
Pakistan would choose such a time to introduce their own legislation that so
closely mirrors it. As the new bill is already set to go into action the world
can only wait and see how it is used.
Aaron Fountain
11/08/2013
4:38 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment